skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228216 Find in a Library
Title: Legal Issues Arise When Corrections Adopts Technology
Journal: Corrections Today  Volume:71  Issue:4  Dated:August 2009  Pages:76,80
Author(s): Richard B. Rosenblatt
Date Published: August 2009
Page Count: 2
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses legal issues that arise when corrections agencies adopt technology that pertains to e-mail correspondence, cell phones and “jamming,” drug-detecting walk-through scanners, and alternative weapons.
Abstract: The two legal issues associated with e-mail are retention and confidentiality. Where there is an applicable governmental records retention statute, e-mails must be preserved for the same length of time as other records. For requests under the Public Information Act or Freedom of Information Act, e-mails must be disclosed to the same extent as any other written correspondence. Attorney/client privilege, doctor/patient privilege, executive privilege, and marital privilege are the types of e-mail correspondence that might be protected from disclosure. Regarding cell phones and jamming, telephone wiretapping is generally illegal, and these laws apply to cell phones as well as to land lines. There is no right to a blanket sweep of an area to intercept any words spoken by anybody, even if the phones at issue are contraband and illegally possessed, even if one party to the conversation is a prisoner. Products that can prevent cell phones from working inside of a prison, although technologically possible, are legally unavailable. Regarding drug-detecting walk-through scanners, unless a correctional officer is also a law enforcement officer of the jurisdiction, there is no broad power to arrest or search. Moreover, if these drug-detecting devices are capable of alerting to the trace levels some claim, absent constant attention to calibration and an “expert” on hand to validate the outcome, it will be difficult to evade level challenges. When dealing with nonlethal alternative weapons as a means of applying force in a correctional setting, only as much force as is necessary to accomplish a legitimate penological purpose is legally permissible.
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Computer aided operations; Correctional officer legal training; Digital communications; Legal doctrines; Legal training; Mobile digital communications; Telephone communications
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.