skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228256 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Our Oath of Office: A Solemn Promise
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:78  Issue:9  Dated:September 2009  Pages:23-32
Author(s): Jonathan L. Rudd J.D.
Date Published: September 2009
Page Count: 10
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses the history and purpose of the oath that every law enforcement officer in the Nation has taken upon entering his/her profession, i.e., to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Abstract: Article VI of the Constitution itself requires that both Federal and State officers of all three branches of government (legislative, executive, and judicial) take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution. Unlike the presidential oath, the particular wording of the oath is not specified in the Constitution, only the requirement that an oath be taken to support and defend the U.S. Constitution. The exact wording of the oath has been determined by the Federal and State legislatures. Through the U.S. Constitution, the founding fathers sought to create a balanced government based on constitutional principles. The U.S. Constitution consists of only seven articles that embody the fundamental principles of popular sovereignty, separation of powers, and federalism. It allows for a process of amendment and provides a system of checks and balances. This article discusses these principles and how they apply to modern law enforcement. The focus is on the Bill of Rights and the 14th amendment (the due-process clause from which criminal procedure has emerged). Over time, the U.S. Supreme Court has selectively incorporated most of the provisions of the Bill of Rights and applied them to the States, thereby unifying fundamental criminal procedure law throughout the United States. Currently, every law enforcement academy in America provides training in constitutional law, because virtually every aspect of an officer's job pertains to constitutional limitations on the authority of government in relation to the rights of the individual. Also, every time officers prepare an affidavit and request approval of a warrant, they are adhering to the constitutional principle of checks and balances. 36 notes
Main Term(s): Police legal training
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Police due process training; Police legal limitations; Right to Due Process
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.