skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228334 
Title: Investigative Interviewing as a Therapeutic Jurisprudential Approach (From International Developments in Investigative Interviewing, P 149-175, 2009, Tom Williamson, Becky Milne, and Stephen P. Savage, eds. - See NCJ-228326)
Author(s): Ulf Holmberg
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 27
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on a therapeutic jurisprudential perspective, this chapter discusses the distinction between police interrogation and investigative interviewing.
Abstract: The chapter first traces the trend away from coercion to deception in police attempts to gain confessions and information from suspects. An example of deceptive interviewing techniques is the Reid technique, which uses a consciously persuasive tactic to create a conversational rapport in order to win the suspect’s trust and obtain a confession. The interrogator gradually breaks down the suspect’s resistance to make him/her vulnerable to making incriminating statements. The interrogator essentially navigates the suspect into sharing the interrogator’s assumption that he/she is guilty of the crime at issue and that their rapport will be confirmed and reinforced by the suspect’s open confession. Several researchers have found a high risk in using persuasive interview techniques, because they may produce false confessions. Several theories are offered as to why this is the case. Therapeutic jurisprudence, on the other hand, involves investigative interviewing, with the objective of obtaining information on what the interviewee remembers from a crime event, as well as voluntary admissions from suspects. Whether the interviewee is a suspect, witness, or victim, the interview is designed to help the interviewee remember events and share information and feelings about what occurred. The techniques used respect the interviewee and proceed without preconceived notions of the interviewee’s culpability in the crime at issue. This chapter and its referred studies indicate that an interviewee’s sense of psychological well-being is important in an interview’s production of accurate and voluntary sharing of information including confessions. Further research is needed in order to define psychological well-being and how it can be facilitated and measured. 97 references
Main Term(s): Police interrogation training
Index Term(s): Interrogation procedures; Interrogation training; Interview and interrogation; Suspect interrogation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.