skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228335 
Title: Increasing Cognitive Load in Interviews to Detect Deceit (From International Developments in Investigative Interviewing, P 176-189, 2009, Tom Williamson, Becky Milne, and Stephen P. Savage, eds. - See NCJ-228326)
Author(s): Aldert Vrij; Ronald Fisher; Samantha Mann; Sharon Leal
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
Swindon SN2 1UJ,
Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Grant Number: RES-000-23-0292;RES-000-22-1632
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After examining existing protocols for detecting deceit in investigative interviews, this chapter discusses the use of “cognitive load” as a means of detecting deceit in such interviews.
Abstract: Three interview protocols are currently used to detect deceit. The two most widely used interview protocols are the Control Question Polygraph Test, which measures physiological responses during an interview, and the Behavior Analysis Interview, which measures verbal and nonverbal responses. These protocols are based on the assumption that liars are afraid of being detected, which causes them to have a distinctive arousal when answering key questions. According to the National Research Council, however, this underlying assumption is theoretically weak, since liars do not necessarily show more arousal or a distinctive arousal when answering key questions. Another approach to detecting deception is based upon the premise that people orient toward personally significant stimuli; for example, they may be interested in a conversation only when their names are mentioned. This theory is exemplified by the Guilty Knowledge Polygraph Test. Measuring orienting responses, however, requires analyzing physiological responses that often can be assessed only with impractically sophisticated and expensive equipment. Given the theoretical weakness of the fear-based approach and the practical difficulties of the orienting approach, the authors of this chapter developed another approach for discriminating between liars and truth-tellers. This approach is based on the premise that in most interviews, lying is cognitively demanding. Due to this cognitive load associated with lying, liars will be particularly debilitated when they are required to engage in cognitively demanding tasks. The cognitive overload created will create measured signs of cognitive load, such as increased stuttering, longer pauses, inconsistent answers, reduced blinking, and decreased movements. Using interview tasks that are cognitively demanding should improve discrimination between liars and truth-tellers in an information-gathering style of interview. 3 notes and 54 references
Main Term(s): Police interrogation training
Index Term(s): Interrogation procedures; Interrogation training; Interview and interrogation; Nonverbal communications; Suspect interrogation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.