skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228542 Find in a Library
Title: Inmate Perspective on the Remand Crisis in Canada
Journal: Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice  Volume:51  Issue:3  Dated:July 2009  Pages:355-379
Author(s): Michael Weinrath
Date Published: July 2009
Page Count: 25
Publisher: http://www.ccja-acjp.ca/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English; French
Country: Canada
Annotation: This study examined the dramatic escalation in the use of pre-trial detention in Canada.
Abstract: Findings suggest that the rise in Canada is likely due to increased time to trial and more vigorous suppression activity by the criminal justice system and its agents. While the provision of two-for-one pre-sentence credit may have some influence, the data indicate that many accused are not content to sit in custody in the hopes of gaining some benefits at sentence and only desire a swift trial and a resolution to their charges. Results only partially supported claims made by criminal justice agents about the misuses of two-for-one by inmates. A proportion of respondents acknowledged use of the two-for-one to delay or postpone their trials or had had this practice identified by their peers. Respondents were also very concerned about the time it took to get to trial. Most inmates wished to have their cases heard expeditiously, but preliminary hearing and trial dates were not set quickly in the province where the study was conducted. In support of the inmates’ responses, findings suggest that speedier trials are the most logical and fairest solution to Canada's remand problem. Committing more resources to get cases processed more quickly is a political question, and regrettably getting support from Provincial or Federal governments would be difficult. Other concerns expressed by the inmates are provided in detail. Data were collected from 226 subjects in custody at a Provincial correctional center between December 2006 and January 2007. Tables, figure, notes, and references
Main Term(s): Pretrial detention
Index Term(s): Foreign correctional systems; Foreign criminal justice systems; Foreign offenders; Foreign sentencing; Pretrial procedures; Right to speedy trial
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=250561

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.