skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228557 Find in a Library
Title: Female Juvenile Risk: Is There a Need for Gendered Assessment Instruments?
Journal: Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice  Volume:7  Issue:4  Dated:October 2009  Pages:313-330
Author(s): Traqina Q. Emeka; Jon R. Sorensen
Date Published: October 2009
Page Count: 18
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined whether a generic risk assessment instrument constructed from a pooled sample adequately identifies the level of risk posed by females compared to males.
Abstract: The risk assessment instrument developed in the current study from a pooled sample worked efficiently for males. Predictor variables associated with female recidivism, such as emotional abuse, sexual abuse, truancy, and running away, were available in the secondary dataset. However, due to the smaller size of the female strata, these variables did not attain statistical significance and as such were not included in the risk assessment instrument. The area under the curve (AUC) for the females in the separate validation sample was .611, which suggests that the instrument was only a marginal improvement over chance prediction of recidivism for youthful female probationers. Although the current study incorporated dynamic variables of substance abuse, family, school, and peers, needs assessment variables were not available, thus limiting the current assessment to a second-generation risk prediction. Using secondary data to create the risk assessment instrument likely contributed to a lower overall level of predictability for both girls and boys in the model developed than would have been possible if information had been gathered from multiple data sources to create a comprehensive assessment of risk factors and specific predictors. Data were collected from 8,293 juvenile probation referrals from the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission database. Tables and references
Main Term(s): Juvenile recidivism prediction; Male female offender comparisons
Index Term(s): Female offenders; Juvenile probation effectiveness; Juvenile probation statistics; Juvenile Recidivism; Probation effectiveness; Probationers attitudes; Recidivism causes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.