skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228688 Find in a Library
Title: Do Judicial Responses to Restraining Order Requests Discriminate Against Male Victims of Domestic Violence?
Journal: Journal of Family Violence  Volume:24  Issue:8  Dated:November 2009  Pages:625-637
Author(s): Henry J. Muller; Sarah L. Desmarais; John M. Hamel
Date Published: November 2009
Page Count: 13
Publisher: http://www.springer.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on an examination of a random sample of 157 petitions for temporary restraining orders (TROs) in a California court that involved intimate partners, dating couples, and married persons, this study determined whether judicial decisions to grant TROs were biased against male victims of domestic violence.
Abstract: The study found that overall, male victims of domestic violence who were seeking TROs were not as likely to receive them as female victims in those cases where low levels of violence were alleged by the plaintiff; however, in cases where moderate to high violence was alleged by the plaintiff, there was no evidence of judicial gender discrimination in the granting of TROs. The study also found that only a small number of petitioners were men, perhaps because research has indicated that male victims of domestic violence are less likely than female victims to express fear of their partners. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that Sacramento Family Court judges may share beliefs consistent with the patriarchal paradigm that holds the view that only women are true victims of domestic violence. In order to compare the frequency with which TRO requests were filed by male and female plaintiffs, researchers conducted Chi-square analyses and calculated effect size using phi coefficients. The same analytical approach was used to examine the distribution of degree and type of alleged violence. Researchers conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis in order to compare whether alleged violence differed as a function of plaintiff sex. Separate logistic regression analyses were used to examine the roles of sex and level of violence in predicting whether TROs were issued or the case was dismissed. 4 tables and 85 references
Main Term(s): Victims of violent crime
Index Term(s): California; Domestic assault; Domestic assault prevention; Judicial discretion; Male survivors; Restraining orders; Sex discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=250708

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.