skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228758 Find in a Library
Title: Failures in Criminal Investigation
Journal: Police Chief  Volume:76  Issue:10  Dated:October 2009  Pages:54-56,58,60-62,64,66
Author(s): D. Kim Rossmo
Date Published: October 2009
Page Count: 9
Type: Instructional Material; Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article identifies "cognitive biases," "organizational traps," and "probability errors" that lead to failures in criminal investigations, i.e. the failure to prosecute the guilty person or the mistaken prosecution of an innocent person.
Abstract: "Cognitive biases" that can lead to failed criminal investigations include the biased beliefs and memory limitations of eyewitnesses to the crime being investigated; investigators' reliance on their intuition rather than reliable and adequate data that are carefully and logically analyzed; investigators' use of simplistic "rules of thumb" that ignore the complexities and alternative scenarios presented by case evidence; and the related cognitive bias of "tunnel vision," which focuses narrowly on a limited range of possibilities regarding the features of and suspects in a case. "Organizational traps" that can lead to failed investigations pertain to characteristics of the structure and dynamics of the law enforcement agency pursuing an investigation. Organizations tend to promote uniformity and standardization that resists change and creativity, which can restrict investigators' options and behaviors in pursuing and analyzing evidence. Organizations also are reluctant to acknowledge mistakes and change course in major investigations that receive media attention. "Probability errors" that lead to failed investigations pertain to flawed assessments of the likelihood that a set of events is due to a particular set of causes. Related probability errors are the failure to consider coincidence in assessing links among events and computation mistakes that underestimate or overestimate the likelihood that two or more events would be connected. If all of the aforementioned factors in failed investigations are to be acknowledged and addressed, law enforcement agencies and their investigative personnel must be trained to recognize the various factors that can undermine or misdirect an investigation. Organizational checks and balances must also be devised to ensure that investigations are carefully scrutinized for flaws and oversights. 1 figure and 15 notes
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Computer crime investigative Training; Criminal investigation; Criminal investigation overview; Investigative techniques; Police management
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.