skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228763 Find in a Library
Title: ILP Abbreviations for the ISE and NCISP Can Spell Trouble
Journal: Police Chief  Volume:76  Issue:10  Dated:October 2009  Pages:138,140,141
Author(s): Thomas J. Martinelli; Lawrence E. Shaw
Date Published: October 2009
Page Count: 3
Publisher: http://www.theiacp.org 
Type: Instructional Material; Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article notes the expanding lexicon of abbreviations (including acronyms and "initialisms") in the nomenclature of intelligence-led policing (ILP), the intelligence-sharing environment (ISE), and the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan (NCISP), which makes the world of ILP that much more challenging and frustrating for the many newcomers; this article proposes a "comfort zone template" of a few abbreviations.
Abstract: From a historical and legal perspective, ILP is still in its embryonic stages, so traditional law enforcement procedures must apply a reasonably familiar template to intelligence gathering, retention, and dissemination. The key abbreviations that go to the core of ILP are SARs (suspicious activity reports) and CAP (common sense, audits, and purges). The ILP function begins with tips, leads, raw information, and officer intuitions. These are all documented in SARs, which consist of filed interview reports, street-level officers' observations, instincts, and experiences that focus on suspicious behaviors. The focus of SARs is behavior, so ILP training must clearly define what constitutes suspicious behavior and why. Once each SAR is critiqued and determined to have a potential terrorism nexus, it becomes an ISE-SAR (information-sharing environment suspicious activity report). For local police developing terrorist intelligence, the key acronym is CAP. This refers to the practice of using common sense and accountability that attempts to ensure that ILP does not stray beyond the constitutional parameters for the rights of individuals. It is critical that intelligence investigation be audited to ensure that national minimal standards of accountability are followed in protecting the privacy rights of those targeted for intelligence collection. Annual internal and external audits of the organizations' criminal intelligence system should be conducted. Common sense implies the application of a reasonable-officer standard for intelligence collection. Unsubstantiated and unreliable tips and leads should be purged from official intelligence files. 6 notes
Main Term(s): Police intelligence operations
Index Term(s): Counter-terrorism intelligence; Intelligence acquisition; Intelligence analysis; Intelligence files; Intelligence units; Law Enforcement Intelligence Units
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=250787

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.