skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228764 Find in a Library
Title: Privacy Police: Sense-Enhancing Technology and the Future of Intelligence-Led Policing
Journal: Police Chief  Volume:76  Issue:10  Dated:October 2009  Pages:142,144,146,147
Author(s): Joseph A. Schafer; Thomas J. Martinelli
Date Published: October 2009
Page Count: 4
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article draws lessons for intelligence-led policing from the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Kyllo v. United States, which held that the warrantless use of thermal imaging in detecting an unusual amount of waste heat emanating from above the suspect's garage was unconstitutional, because it involved the electronic penetration of the wall of the suspect's house, thus violating his expectation of privacy.
Abstract: The majority opinion in this case compels law enforcement agencies and their trainers - whether in narcotics, homicide, or intelligence - to revisit their investigative procedures and privacy guidelines, recognizing that they cannot use various technologies to cut corners or abandon the traditional policing techniques that courts have approved for years. Regardless of the current threats and dangers posed by terrorism, law enforcement agencies have not been given a license to circumvent the fourth amendment. Law enforcement agencies must review, research, and rewrite their privacy policies and restructure their training curriculums in order to incorporate constitutionally mandated parameters for collecting and using personal identifying information on citizens targeted for intelligence gathering. Information collected on individuals, no matter how incriminating and useful it may be in protecting the public from harm, cannot finally be used in the courts for a criminal conviction of that individual unless the information collected was by means that did not violate the constitutional rights of the targeted individual. The legal challenges of balancing the rights of the individual to privacy versus society's right to be protected from the next terrorist act or major crime threat must be addressed in order for intelligence-led policing to be effective. 10 notes
Main Term(s): Police intelligence operations
Index Term(s): Counter-terrorism intelligence; Intelligence acquisition; Intelligence units; Police legal limitations; Right of privacy; Search warrants; Thermal imaging; US Supreme Court decisions; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.