skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228776 Find in a Library
Title: Health Care Policies Addressing Transgender Inmates in Prison Systems in the United States
Journal: Journal of Correctional Health Care  Volume:15  Issue:4  Dated:October 2009  Pages:280-291
Author(s): George R. Brown, M.D.; Everett McDuffie, M.D.
Date Published: October 2009
Page Count: 12
Publisher: http://www.sagepub.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined health care polices for transgendered inmates.
Abstract: Findings show that transgender inmates pose difficult challenges for the corrections environment; chief among these challenges is the interpretation of the legal requirement to provide adequate medical treatment for serious medical needs, and whether multimodal treatment (psychiatric, medical, and/or surgical ) described in the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (HBIGDA) standards of care need to be afforded to inmates with a legitimate diagnosis of gender identity disorders (GID). Litigation of these issues, revolving around the principles of adequate care for serious medical needs and deliberate indifference have sometimes been effective in changing some States’ Department of Corrections (DOC) directives, either by court order or by settlement. Both the 8th and 14th amendment challenges have been brought successfully against DOCs for failing to provide appropriate evaluation and treatment for inmates with GID. California has the most comprehensive directive and allows for both continuation and initiation of cross-sex hormones for appropriately diagnosed inmates. Cases of autocastration in States whose policies allow for appropriate treatment of GID appear to be rare, whereas in States with no provision for cross-sex hormonal treatment for inmates with GID, costly and potentially lethal outcomes may be a higher likelihood event. Table, appendix, and references
Main Term(s): Gender issues; Inmate health care
Index Term(s): Mental disorders; Psychiatric services; Special needs offenders; Treatment effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=250800

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.