skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228807 Find in a Library
Title: Giant That Never Woke: Parole Authorities as the Lynchpin to Evidence-Based Practices and Prisoner Reentry
Journal: Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice  Volume:25  Issue:4  Dated:November 2009  Pages:397-411
Author(s): Mario A. Paparozzi; Roger Guy
Date Published: November 2009
Page Count: 15
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This essay argues that parole authorities should be prepared for and afforded the opportunity to optimally perform their discretionary release decisionmaking function in the context of improved and expanded prison-based rehabilitation and reentry programs and services.
Abstract: Ideally, parole authorities should be leaders in promoting the public safety and justice potential of parole. Unfortunately, many parole authorities are not in a strategic position to assume leadership in correctional policy and practice. This is due, in part, to parole board members’ lack of professional knowledge and values that reduce recidivism through offender rehabilitation and reentry services. For parole authorities to be upgraded to a leadership role they must be informed about evidence-based practices and reentry services within prisons. A discussion about core competencies for serving on a parole authority - whether as a chair, member, or executive staff - must begin with an acknowledgment of the importance of core values. If an individual has values that are congruent with parole’s mission, then it is possible to build on that foundation through training and education in developing professional competence. The required core values for participation in parole decisionmaking include the following beliefs: Many offenders can become prosocial if provided with appropriate services; offenders should be provided with services that help them lead law-abiding lives, because it is socially just to do so; crime victims are legitimate stakeholders in the parole release and revocation process; and respect for knowledge obtained through empirical research and recognized theory can lead to improved parole release/revocation decisions, thereby enhancing public safety. Given these core values, parole authorities should develop specialized core competencies. This essay lists 16 abilities and knowledge categories that constitute core competencies for participants in parole authorities. 98 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Parole; Parole board; Parole board discretion; Parole effectiveness; Reentry; Rehabilitation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.