skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228991 Find in a Library
Title: Cost Matters: A Randomized Experiment Comparing Recidivism Between Two Styles of Prisons
Journal: Journal of Experimental Criminology  Volume:5  Issue:4  Dated:December 2009  Pages:371-397
Author(s): David Bierie
Date Published: December 2009
Page Count: 27
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2005-DB-BX-0004
Publisher: http://www.springer.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In comparing recidivism, this study evaluated the costs and benefits of operating the Maryland boot camp, referred to as the MAP program, versus operating the MAP program at a traditional prison.
Abstract: Study findings indicate that even without consideration of differences in post release impact, the boot camp cost less to run per inmate. In addition, the boot camp generated substantially less recidivism-harm relative to the traditional prison. The State of Maryland operates a correctional boot camp for adults, a facility focused on delivering intensive therapy through a highly structured environment. The program allows offenders who are first time inmates and have nonviolent convictions to reduce their prison terms to a 6 month sentence in exchange for serving those 6-months successfully at the boot camp. This is referred to as the MAP program. However, in 2001, the State considered a policy change in which the MAP program would be administered at a traditional prison facility rather than the boot camp. This change was tied directly to the issue of program costs and recidivism. This study was designed to test assumptions regarding reduced administration cost under the policy change, as well as equivalence in recidivism costs. A randomized experiment was conducted to isolate the difference in program impacts on recidivism, and cost-benefit tools were used to translate differences into harm-weighed metrics. Tables, appendix and references
Main Term(s): Shock incarceration programs
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis; Corrections effectiveness; Corrections management; Cost analysis; Cost/Benefit Analysis; Deterrence effectiveness; Maryland; NIJ grant-related documents; Recidivism; State correctional facilities
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=251018

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.