skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 229113 Find in a Library
Title: Inmate Prerelease Assessment (IPASS) Aftercare Placement Recommendation as a Predictor of Rural Inmate's 12-Step Attendance and Treatment Entry Postrelease
Journal: Offender Rehabilitation  Volume:48  Issue:8  Dated:November-December 2009  Pages:725-743
Author(s): Carrie B. Oser; Elizabeth P. Biebel; Jennifer R. Havens; Michele Staton-Tindall; Hannah K. Knudsen
Date Published: November 2009
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892
Grant Number: U01-DA-016205;K01-DA-021309
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined whether prerelease drug treatment recommendations for rural inmates after their release - based on the results of the Inmate Prerelease Assessment (IPASS), which recommends either intensive or nonintensive treatment postrelease - predicted the likelihood that rural offenders would enter a 12-step attendance and treatment program within 6 months after their release from prison.
Abstract: The study found that although the level of drug treatment recommended by the IPASS was the primary variable of interest, it was not a significant predictor of either self-help (12-step) attendance or treatment entry for rural inmates within 6 months postrelease. Two explanations are offered for this finding. First, it is widely known that 12-step programming and substance abuse treatment services are limited in rural settings. Therefore, the identified need and services recommended by the IPASS may be irrelevant when offenders are released to areas were recommended services do not exist. Second, this study had a small sample size of rural offenders, which could limit the statistical power needed to detect significant differences. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed in order to examine the predictive value of IPASS on substance-abuse service use among rural offenders. According to the IPASS, a little over half of the inmates (53 percent) paroled or released to rural counties should receive an intensive aftercare placement in their communities. Although most rural offenders (80 percent) attended 12-step meetings, only 29 percent entered a structured substance abuse treatment program. Of the rural offenders who received an intensive aftercare placement recommendation from IPASS, only 38 percent received formal substance abuse treatment services. Between 2005 and 2006, 106 inmates were recruited from 3 prison-based substance abuse treatment programs in Kentucky. One of the criteria for being included in the study was to be within 90 days of release to a rural county. 3 tables and 44 references
Main Term(s): Inmate drug treatment
Index Term(s): Drug treatment programs; Inmate drug treatment; Kentucky; Post-release programs; Prerelease programs; Rural area studies; Rural corrections
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.