skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 229156 Find in a Library
Title: Crime Rates and Youth Incarceration in Texas and California Compared: Public Safety or Public Waste?
Author(s): Mike Males, Ph.D.; Christina Stahlkoph, Ph.D.; Daniel Macallair, M.P.A.
Corporate Author: Ctr on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
United States of America
Date Published: June 2007
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: Ctr on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
San Francisco, CA 94103
Sale Source: Ctr on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
40 Boardman Place
San Francisco, CA 94103
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A comparative analysis is conducted on youth imprisonment trends and practices in the states of Texas and California.
Abstract: Home to 22 percent of America’s youth, Texas and California have vastly different youth incarceration policies. Texas’s youth sentencing policies over the past 10 years emphasized increased imprisonment for younger offenders for less serious crimes. From 1995 to 2006, Texas has increased the number of youth incarcerated under the age of 18 by 48 percent. In contrast, California increased the overall age of young offenders committed to youth correctional facilities and diverted many juveniles who formerly would have been imprisoned, thereby reducing the total number of juveniles incarcerated in youth prisons by 75 percent. Under incapacitation theory, the significantly higher rates of youth incarceration in Texas should have produced an accelerated decrease in the crime rate relative to California. However, as this analysis indicates no such differential effect occurred in the crime rates of the two States. This result suggests that juvenile crime control policies emphasizing incarceration and similar punitive measures need to be reconsidered, and that Texas’s current youth incarceration policy is unjustified and unnecessary. This paper explored the radically different youth incarceration practices between Texas and California. Figures, tables, and references
Main Term(s): Juvenile Corrections/Detention
Index Term(s): California; Comparative analysis; Corrections effectiveness; Effects of juvenile imprisonment; Imprisoned/nonimprisoned delinquency comparison; Incarceration; Juvenile correctional planning; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness; Juvenile offenders; Texas
Note: Downloaded December 24, 2009
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.