skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 229204 Find in a Library
Title: Effects of Test-Strategy Coaching on Measures of Competency to Stand Trial
Journal: Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice  Volume:9  Issue:3  Dated:July-September 2009  Pages:179-198
Author(s): Rachael E. Springman Ph.D.; Brian R. Vandenberg Ph.D.
Date Published: September 2009
Page Count: 20
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The study examined individuals who are coached to malinger to determine if they can elude detection on measures assessing competency to stand trial.
Abstract: Results indicate that the two malingering groups appeared significantly impaired on overall competency scores in comparison to the control group. Furthermore, the two malingering groups appeared significantly elevated on malingering scale scores in comparison to the control group. No differences were found between the uncoached and coached malingering group on the competency and malingering scale scores. Both malingering scales effectively discriminated between malingerers and honest responders. The current study’s findings emphasize the malingering the Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial-Revised Atypical Presentation Scale (ECST-R ATP Scale) over a measure designed for some other purposes the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Data were collected from 92 undergraduates attending a Midwest public university and recruited from the psychology department subject pool; participants were randomly assigned to groups comprising control (honest responders), uncoached malingerer (feign incompetency without tips), and coached malingerer (feign incompetency with tips). Table, figures, and references
Main Term(s): Competency to stand trial; Malingering
Index Term(s): Competency to testify; Defense preparation; Trial preparation; Trials
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.