skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 229318 Find in a Library
Title: Don't Throw Away the Key: Reevaluating Adult Time for Youth Crime in Virginia
Author(s): Andrew Block; Kate Duvall
Date Published: November 2009
Page Count: 39
Sponsoring Agency: JustChildren
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Sale Source: JustChildren
1000 Preston Ave., Suite A
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report calls for a re-examination of Virginia's policies for transferring youth to adult criminal courts where they may be convicted of an adult felony, and it challenges commonly held myths about these transfer practices, followed by recommendations for reform.
Abstract: This report first challenges five myths that have been advanced to support the continuation of Virginia's current youth transfer policies. One myth-challenging argument is that the predicted explosion of youth violence used to justify sweeping changes to Virginia's transfer laws never occurred. The second myth-challenging argument is that the current transfer system is over-inclusive, in that the youth transferred to adult courts are not only the chronic, violent, youth offenders as is claimed. The third myth-challenging argument is that youth tried and sentenced as adults are more likely to reoffend than youth who remain in the juvenile justice system, contrary to the claim that youth transfers reduce reoffending. A fourth argument offered is that at no point in their development should youth be considered as adults whose behavior fits the myth, "once a criminal, always a criminal." Youth are likely to outgrow their delinquent behaviors and respond positively to rehabilitative efforts. The fifth myth-challenging argument is that the majority of professionals who best understand the current system's mechanics and consequences support reform, contrary to the myth that a system in place for 14 years must be working fine. Three recommendations are offered. First, restore authority over transfer decisions to juvenile and domestic relations district court judges, except in those cases that currently require automatic transfer. Second, increase training for circuit court judges regarding youthful offenders and dispositions. Third, eliminate or greatly reduce the use of adult jails for the pretrial detention of transferred youth. 171 notes
Main Term(s): Juvenile court waiver
Index Term(s): Juvenile justice policies; Juvenile justice reform; Juvenile processing; Juveniles in adult facilities; Virginia
Note: Downloaded January 14, 2010
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.