skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 229382 Find in a Library
Title: Profile of Paroling Authorities in America: The Strange Bedfellows of Politics and Professionalism
Journal: Prison Journal  Volume:89  Issue:4  Dated:December 2009  Pages:401-425
Author(s): Mario A. Paparozzi; Joel M. Caplan
Date Published: December 2009
Page Count: 25
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines discretionary decisionmaking in parole.
Abstract: This article explores and discusses how paroling authorities are organized, how their members are appointed, and the work experience, training, and credential requirements that support the appointment process. Results reveal that there had been little consistency and minimal attention within and across jurisdictions relative to the work experience, education requirements, and in-service training for members of paroling authorities. Given the indiscriminate nature of educational and work experience requirements, in-service training should be of paramount concern. The data also revealed that compensation for members of paroling authorities is substantial, yet recruitment for paroling authority members is generally a closed political process. Given the precedence of and monetary compensation for serving on a paroling authority, it was asserted that an open recruitment process would produce a substantial pool of highly qualified applicants. One of the central tasks of paroling authorities is to render discretionary decisions regarding parole release, revocation, and offender release contingencies. Discretionary decisionmaking based on professional competence is an important component of several highly regarded professions and business enterprises (jurisprudence, aviation, medicine, engineering, investment, finance, etc.) Recommendations are made for future studies addressing the relationship between professional qualifications of paroling authority members and parole outcomes. Data were collected from paroling authority chairs of 48 States and the District of Columbia from October 2000 through April 2001. Tables, figure, notes, and references
Main Term(s): Discretionary decisions; Parole board
Index Term(s): Attitude change; Judicial compensation; Organization development; Professionalization
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.