skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 229391 Find in a Library
Title: Gender Differences in Partner Violence in Context: Deconstructing Johnson's (2001) Control-Based Typology of Violent Couples
Journal: Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma  Volume:18  Issue:6  Dated:September 2009  Pages:604-622
Author(s): Jody M. Ross; Julia C. Babcock
Date Published: September 2009
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20014
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77004
Grant Number: MH066943-01A1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines the variables comprising Johnson’s (2001) typology of violent couples dimensionally and in the context of the relationship as they relate to injury and observed behavior.
Abstract: Although it was predicted that women would experience more injuries in relationships predominated by male-perpetrated violence and that men would sustain more injuries in relationships predominated by female-perpetrated violence, these hypotheses were only partially supported. Results show that intimate partner violence (IPV) predicted both men’s and women’s injuries. However, while it was predicted that asymmetry of violence would put the less violent partner at risk for more injuries, this held true only for women’s injuries. Women’s injuries did increase as asymmetry was skewed toward the man being the more violent partner, although the relation was weaker when analyses were based exclusively on men’s reports. In contrast, men’s injuries were related to the cumulative severity of violence within a relationship and not to the gendered asymmetry of IPV. Men and women agreed that regardless of which partner was more violent, men were increasingly injured as total violence within the relationship increased. Data were collected from 281 couples. Tables and references
Main Term(s): Domestic assault; Victims of violent crime
Index Term(s): Behavioral science research; Male survivors; Victim-offender relationships; Violent females
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.