skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 229403 Find in a Library
Title: Does the Inclusion Criterion of Women's Aggression as Opposed to Their Victimization Result in Samples That Differ on Key Dimensions of Intimate Partner Violence?
Journal: Violence Against Women  Volume:16  Issue:1  Dated:January 2010  Pages:84-98
Author(s): Tami P. Sullivan; Jennifer A. Titus; Laura J. Holt; Suzanne C. Swan; Bonnie S. Fisher; David L. Snow
Date Published: January 2010
Page Count: 15
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Bethesda, MD 20892-9561
University of South Carolina
Columbia, SC 29208
Grant Number: R03 DA17668;K23DA019561;2001-WT-BX-0502
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined whether research on intimate partner violence (IPV), using a sample inclusion criterion of women's aggression versus their victimization resulted in different distributions of demographic characteristics and measures of physical, sexual, and psychological IPV and injury in these two sample types.
Abstract: The study found that an inclusion criterion based on physical aggression or victimization did not produce unique samples of "aggressors" and "victims." When independent samples of African-American women participated in separate studies based on either an inclusion criterion of women's physical aggression or victimization in IPV, between-groups comparisons showed that the samples did not differ in physical, sexual, or psychological aggression; physical, sexual or psychological victimization; or inflicted or sustained injury. The study showed that the two samples of women were more similar to each other than previously expected, in that the two groups had similar demographic characteristics and profiles of IPV. The findings suggest that researchers may need to consider different assumptions when interpreting IPV study results; for example, when women's aggression is used as the inclusion criterion of a study, researchers might assume that the research findings indicate that women who are more aggressive compared to women who are more victimized should be generalized to women who are aggressive only. Given the findings of the current study, however, the findings for the aggressors may be generalized to both aggressors and victims, because the samples were drawn from a single population of women involved in relationships characterized by IPV. One of the samples in the current study consisted of 150 African-American women who had used at least one physically aggressive behavior against a male partner within the past 6 months. The other sample consisted of 128 African-American women who had been physically victimized by a male partner within the past 6 months. 3 tables, 6 notes, and 33 references
Main Term(s): Female victims
Index Term(s): Domestic assault; Domestic violence causes; NIJ grant-related documents; Research methods; Victim profiles; Victims of violent crime
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.