skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 229453 Find in a Library
Title: Differential Importance of the Evidence and the Expert on Perceptions of Confessions
Journal: Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice  Volume:9  Issue:4  Dated:October - December 2009  Pages:280-298
Author(s): Morgan Moffa; Judith Platania
Date Published: October 2009
Page Count: 19
Publisher: http://www.taylorandfrancis.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the effects of expert witness testimony and commonly used interrogation tactics on participant-jurors' perceptions of confessions and equivocal forensic evidence.
Abstract: In this study, we examined the effects of expert witness testimony and commonly used interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions and equivocal forensic evidence. Results indicated perceptions of forensic evidence were influenced by expert testimony. Assessments of the value of forensic evidence were significantly lower for participants exposed to expert testimony, compared to those not exposed. This finding demonstrates the potential of expert testimony regarding interrogations to affect other types of testimony. In addition, perceptions of the interrogating detective were influenced by type of tactic. Participants' ratings of the detective were lowest in the maximization interrogation condition compared to minimization and length. Results are discussed in terms of the role of expert testimony and interrogation tactics as related to perceptions of forensic-type evidence. (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Forensic psychology
Index Term(s): Confessions; Evidence collection; Expert witnesses; Interrogation procedures; Interview and interrogation; Juries; Testimony
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=251482

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.