skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 229548     Find in a Library
Title: Comparative Criminological and Criminal Justice Research and the Data that Drive Them
Author(s): Richard R. Bennett
  Journal: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice  Volume:33  Issue:2  Dated:Fall 2009  Pages:171 to 192
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 22
  Annotation: After reviewing the history of the subfield of empirical comparative criminology and criminal justice, this article assesses a typology of comparative studies and identifies sources of comparative data, followed by a discussion of the impediments to and the future of comparative crime and criminal justice research.
Abstract: This historical review notes that although the comparative approach is not new to social science research, it was not until the late 1960s and early 1970s that criminologists began exploring crime comparatively. Since these early efforts, there has been a slowly expanding body of criminological literature that uses comparative techniques. Similarly, comparative studies of justice systems have emerged relatively recently in the scientific literature. Following the historical review of comparative criminology and criminal justice, the article identifies the types of comparative research according to approach, scope, data, and design. The benefits of comparative research are then identified, followed by a review of the sources of comparative data and the validity of the findings based upon those data. A section on types of comparative data addresses official data, survey data, and individual data-collection activities. A section on impediments to comparative research focuses on funding, access to research subjects, language differences, and finding an acceptable outlet in which to publish the findings. The article advises that these impediments to conducting comparative research must be addressed in order to maintain the momentum that has emerged over the last decade. In the short term, funding must be increased; and over the long term, academics must increase emphasis on comparative studies and the comparative perspective at their colleges and universities. In addition, scholarly associations in the fields of criminology and criminal justice must aid and mentor younger members in order to facilitate their successful entry into the comparative field. 10 notes and 72 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Research methods ; Comparative analysis ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Cross cultural analyses ; Criminal justice research ; Cross cultural comparisons ; Secondary data analysis
Publisher URL: 
Type: Issue Overview
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.