skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 229553 Find in a Library
Title: Mixed Method Measurement of Homicide Events in Comparative Research: An Illustration of the Potential of Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Journal: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice  Volume:33  Issue:2  Dated:Fall 2009  Pages:273-307
Author(s): Ineke Haen Marshall; Chris E. Marshall; Ling Ren
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 35
Publisher: http://criminaljustice.msu.edu 
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In presenting some alternative conceptual and methodological approaches to the cross-national comparative study of homicide, this paper uses homicide-related information from 21 countries representing all global regions in demonstrating how Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is one method for comparing typical homicide events across nations.
Abstract: The paper argues that as reported, international homicide statistics are incomplete and unreliable for global descriptions of and comparisons of this crime. In addition, international quantitative measures of homicide rates are superficial and one-dimensional; and the commonly used definition of homicide as interpersonal violence is too narrow. The authors suggest that certain types of comparative questions about homicide might be best answered by using the homicide event; and the research agenda should be broadened to include both interpersonal homicide and collective homicide. The paper argues for a mixed method approach that takes advantage of all qualitative and quantitative data sources available. The QCA method developed by Ragin (1987: 2000) is used as an illustration. The QCA is not a statistical technique in the traditional sense. Instead, it helps delineate characteristics among relatively small groups of cases. A key quality of QCA is its application with small datasets, such as those often confronted in cross-national research. The focus of QCA is on summary measures. Individual cases have a background role that is overshadowed by the interpretation of relationships among variables. In QCA, cases are brought to the foreground to be examined in their full historical, sociological, and political contexts. Key issues of judgment in QCA analysis include the variables that are to be included as independent and dependent variables, as well as the cutoff points needed to create the binary data if the original data are at other than the binary/nominal level. The QCA methodology is demonstrated in the cross-national homicide data from 21 countries. 5 tables, 3 figures, 20 notes, 37 references, and appended illustration of the use of the International Homicide Index
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis; Comparative criminology; Cross-cultural analyses; Cross-cultural comparisons; Homicide; Offense statistics; Research methods
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=251583

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.