skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 230023 Find in a Library
Title: Importance of Co-Convictions in the Prediction of Dangerous Recidivism: Blackmail and Kidnapping as a Demonstration Study
Journal: Criminology & Criminal Justice  Volume:10  Issue:1  Dated:February 2010  Pages:23-36
Author(s): Keith Soothill; Brian Francis; Jiayi Liu
Date Published: February 2010
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: British Economic and Social Research Council
England
Grant Number: RES-576-25-5020;RES-576-25-0019
Document: PDF
Publisher: http://www.sagepub.com 
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study examined co-convictions in regards to predicting serious recidivism.
Abstract: Co-convictions are court convictions made at the same time as a more serious conviction. Their importance has been little recognized. This study investigates their value using data on two separate serious crimes. Taking official conviction careers in England and Wales (1979-2001) for blackmail (n = 5774) and kidnapping offenders (n = 7291), the study considered how much information on co-convictions is normally overlooked, and how knowledge of co-convictions contributes to predicting serious recidivism. The study identified that co-convictions were pervasive, with 54 percent of convictions for blackmail and 77 percent for kidnapping having co-convictions. Co-convictions provided extra explanatory power in predicting the risk of a subsequent sexual or violent offence for both blackmail and kidnapping. For blackmail, most types of co-conviction were associated with a significantly raised relative risk, whereas for kidnapping, only co-convictions which were not acquisitive, sexual or violent had a significantly raised relative risk. The authors concluded that co-convictions are a useful measure of short-term specialization and are important when predicting serious recidivism. 1 figure, 4 tables, 5 notes, and 22 references (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Convictions; England; Extortion; Foreign criminal justice research; Kidnapping; Multiple charges; Recidivism prediction; Sex offenses; Violent crimes; Wales
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=252055

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.