skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 230039 Find in a Library
Title: Interplay of Moral Norms and Instrumental Incentives in Crime Causation
Journal: Criminology  Volume:48  Issue:1  Dated:February 2010  Pages:259-294
Author(s): Clemens Kroneberg; Isolde Heintze; Guido Mehlkop
Date Published: February 2010
Page Count: 36
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study analyzed the willingness of 2,130 adults residing in Dresden, Germany, to engage in shoplifting and tax fraud, in order to assess the interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in testing the dynamics of weighing the costs and benefits of criminal acts under the assumption that criminal behavior is a rational choice.
Abstract: The study found that only respondents who did not feel bound by internalized moral norms engaged in the instrumental cost-benefits reasoning assumed under rational choice theories (RCTs) of criminal behavior. Thus, for people who have strongly internalized norms against the behaviors posed to them (shoplifting and tax fraud), and in the absence of powerful neutralizations (justifications for waiving these moral norms), instrumental incentives (possible cost and probably benefits for the self) are irrelevant to whether or not they would commit shoplifting and tax fraud. The main methodological implication of these study findings is that straightforward applications of RCT can lead to erroneous conclusions. The authors of the current study argue that internalized moral norms are not just additional incentives traded against instrumental, tangible incentives; rather, these normative moral attitudes act as a moral filter that precludes even weighing the costs and benefits of the action. Survey data were collected between November 2005 and January 2006 in Dresden, Germany. The sample was randomly chosen from the city's Bureau of Statistics to receive the questionnaire. Recipients were required to be 18 years old or older. The questionnaire contained 74 questions regarding respondents' victimization as well as their own willingness to engage in particular offenses. As dependent variables, the study used self-reports of whether respondents would be willing in the future to shoplift or commit tax fraud, respectively. All responses were anonymous. 5 tables, 2 figures, 100 references, and appendix
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Crime causes theory; Foreign criminal justice research; Germany; Moral development; Rational public choice theory; Shoplifting; Shoplifting causes; Tax evasion
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.