skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 230065 Find in a Library
Title: Interviewing Suspects: Practice, Science, and Future Directions
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:15  Issue:1  Dated:February 2010  Pages:39-55
Author(s): Saul M. Kassin; Sara C. Appleby; Jennifer Torkildson Perillo
Date Published: February 2010
Page Count: 17
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines ways to reduce false confessions and increase the diagnostic value of classic police interrogation through the reduction in use of extreme forms of confrontation and trickery and encouraging the use of investigative interviewing practices.
Abstract: Crime suspects in the United States are typically questioned in a two-step process aimed, first, at behavioral lie detection during a pre-interrogation interview, followed by the elicitation of a confession during the interrogation itself (in Great Britain, the practice of investigative interviewing does not make this sharp distinction). Research conducted on the first step show that police investigators often target innocent people for interrogation because of erroneous but confident judgments of deception. Research on the second step shows that innocent people are sometimes induced to confess to crimes they did not commit as a function of certain dispositional vulnerabilities or the use of overly persuasive interrogation tactics. Citing recent studies, this paper proposes that laboratory paradigms be used to help build more diagnostic models of interrogation. Substantively, it is suggested that the British PEACE approach to investigative interviewing may provide a potentially effective alternative to the classic American interrogation. As a matter of policy, it is suggested that the videotaping of entire interrogations from a balanced camera perspective is necessary to improve the fact finding accuracy of judges and juries who must evaluate confession evidence in court. References (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Interview and interrogation
Index Term(s): Confessions; Field interrogation and interview; Interrogation procedures; Interrogation training; Police policies and procedures; Police procedures training; Suspect interrogation
Note: For additional articles see NCJ-230062-64 and NCJ-230066-70.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.