skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 230066 Find in a Library
Title: Truth About Lies: What Works in Detecting High-Stakes Deception?
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:15  Issue:1  Dated:February 2010  Pages:57-75
Author(s): Stephen Porter; Leanne ten Brinke
Date Published: February 2010
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: National Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
Ottawa, ON,, K1A 1H5
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Ottawa, ON K1P 6G4, Canada
Publisher: http://www.bps.org.uk 
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: A view of the current understanding of high-stakes lies that often occur in forensic contexts is presented.
Abstract: In this paper, a view is provided of the current understanding of high-stakes lies often occurring in forensic contexts. It underscores the importance of avoiding widespread pitfalls of deception detection and challenging prevailing assumptions concerning strategies for catching liars. The promise and limitations of each of non-verbally/body language, facial, verbal/linguistic, and physiological channels in detecting deception are discussed. In observing the absence of a single cue or behavioral channel that consistently reveals deception, a holistic approach with concurrent attention to multiple channels of a target's behavior (ideally videotaped for review) and changes from baseline behavior is recommended whenever possible. Among the best-validated cues to be considered together include: illustrators, blink and pause rate, speech rate, vague descriptions, repeated details, contextual embedding, reproduction of conversations, and emotional 'leakage' in the face. While advocating a reliance on empirical evidence, it is observed that few studies of high-stakes deception yet have been conducted. Further, some manifestations of lying are highly idiosyncratic and difficult to address in quantitative research, pointing to the need for keen observation skills, and psychological insight. A recurring theme is the need for the field to devise innovative approaches for studying high-stakes lies to promote ecological validity. Ultimately, such work will provide a strong foundation for the responsible application of deception research in forensic and security settings. References (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Psychological stress evaluator
Index Term(s): Forensic sciences; Fraud
Note: For additional articles see NCJ-230062-65 and NCJ-230067-70.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=252098

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.