skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 230070 Find in a Library
Title: Jury Decision-Making Biases and Methods to Counter Them
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:15  Issue:1  Dated:February 2010  Pages:133-154
Author(s): Tarika Daftary-Kapur; Rafaele Dumas; Steven D. Penrod
Date Published: February 2010
Page Count: 22
Type: Literature Review
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study examined research on the impact of jury decisionmaking; specifically, jury research on the impact of jury instructions, inadmissible evidence, scientific evidence, and pretrial publicity on juries.
Abstract: The objective of this review was to give a broad overview of various biases associated with jury decisionmaking. Specifically, a review of the research was conducted on the impact of pretrial publicity, jury instructions, inadmissible evidence, and scientific evidence. It elucidates various challenges jurors may face across systems around the world and remedies to counter these challenges. After 50 years of scientific research on juries and juror decisionmaking, there are still many gaps in understanding how factors such as pretrial publicity, inadmissible evidence, scientific evidences, and jury instructions influence juries. At the same time the field has developed a level of appreciation for these problems and is making strives toward understanding them. Based on this review some conclusion can be drawn regarding the areas of decisionmaking reviewed. Jury instructions; Research shows that jurors have difficulties in understanding pattern instructions, at the same time some insights were developed into ways instructions can be rewritten to increase comprehensibility. Inadmissible evidence: There is an awareness of the cognitive effort involved in attempting to disregard evidence but are at this point unclear on how to eliminate the associated problems. Scientific evidence: Research has illuminated the difficulties jurors have with comprehending scientific evidence. Better education of jurors and judges can help to address this issue. Pretrial publicity: The threats posed by pretrial publicity to the defendant’s right to a fair trial are clear. At the same time (save change of venue) there is a need to develop cost-effective remedies to help overcome media-induced biases. Referemces (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Jury decisionmaking
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Discrimination; Juries; Jury instructions; Psychological evaluation
Note: For additional articles see NCJ-230062-69.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.