skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 230183 Find in a Library
Title: Making Sense of DNA Backlogs - Myths vs. Reality
Author(s): Mark Nelson
Date Published: June 2010
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In examining why backlogs in DNA processing persist even after the Federal Government has provided millions of dollars to eliminate the backlog, this paper addresses the nature of the backlog and how it can be reduced.
Abstract: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), the research arm of the U.S. Justice Department, defines a DNA “backlogged” case as “one that has not been tested 30 days after it was submitted to the laboratory.” Crime laboratories have two kinds of DNA backlogs, and each has its own distinctive issues. “Casework backlogs” consist of forensic evidence collected from crime scenes, victims, and suspects in criminal cases. Processing this type of evidence is time-consuming because the evidence must be screened to determine if, and what kind of, biological materials are present before DNA testing can even begin. The second type of backlog consists of convicted offender and arrestee sample backlogs. By 2009, the Federal Government and all 50 States had passed laws that require the collection of DNA from offenders convicted of certain crimes. In addition, the Federal Government and many States have also passed legislation that allows the collection of DNA samples from people arrested for certain crimes. The processing of such DNA samples involves the testing of the samples and the subsequent review and upload of the resulting DNA profiles into the national DNA data base, called CODIS (Combined DNA Indexing System). Delays in processing such DNA samples may occur at the analysis, the review, or the uploading into CODIS. After defining and identifying reasons for DNA processing backlogs, this paper explains why backlogs are not a static problem that will eventually recede with time and effort, but rather involve a dynamic situation that may increase or decrease based on the law of supply and demand. 6 exhibits and 4 notes
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Case processing; Crime laboratories; Crime laboratory management; DNA fingerprinting; Evidence identification; National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Note: NIJ Special Report, June 2010
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=252215

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.