skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 235897 Find in a Library
Title: Risk and Expertise in the Speed Limit Enforcement Debate: Challenges, Adaptations and Responses
Journal: Criminology & Criminal Justice  Volume:11  Issue:3  Dated:July 2011  Pages:225-241
Author(s): Helen Wells
Date Published: July 2011
Page Count: 17
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This article explores the use of speed cameras to enforce speed limits.
Abstract: This article explores the changing role of expertise within a society increasingly subject to policies justified by a ‘risk’ narrative. It uses the ongoing debate around the use of speed cameras to enforce speed limits as a lens through which the twin challenges of the ‘demonopolization’ and ‘democratization’ of expertise can be understood. Drawing on empirical research conducted with those who view themselves as experts in relation to the issue of speeding it proposes, first, that traditionally conceived experts such as government officials, police officers and road safety practitioners have had to adapt to the reality of a ‘marketplace’ of expertise in which their own expert product must be marketed in order to compete with that of other self-proclaimed expert voices. Second, and drawing on research conducted with drivers themselves, this research proposes that these marketing strategies are being deployed for the benefit of a public which actually sees itself as emancipated from such external sources of expertise and able to claim expert status in its own right. The findings are of potential relevance to any policymaker, practitioner or pressure group seeking to use a risk narrative to legitimate or oppose a policy stance. (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Police
Index Term(s): Camera technology; Reckless driving; Speed measuring laser devices
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=257884

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.