skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 236241 Find in a Library
Title: No Place for Kids: The Case for Reducing Juvenile Incarceration
Author(s): Richard A. Mendel
Date Published: 2011
Page Count: 51
Sponsoring Agency: Annie E. Casey Foundation
Baltimore, MD 21202
Sale Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation
701 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation examines the problem of juvenile incarceration in the United States.
Abstract: This report notes that in 2007, approximately 60,500 youth were confined in correctional facilities or other residential programs each night by order of a juvenile delinquency court. These facilities included group homes, residential treatment centers, boot camps, wilderness programs, county-run youth facilities, and long-term youth correctional facilities operated primarily by State governments or private companies under contract to the States. This report examines six primary problems with States’ continued reliance on large prison-like correctional facilities for young offenders. These problems include: 1) dangerousness – these institutions subject the confined youth to intolerable levels of violence, abuse, and other forms of maltreatment; 2) ineffective – the recidivism rates for youth confined to these facilities are uniformly high; 3) unnecessary – a substantial number of youth confined to these facilities pose minimal risk to public safety; 4) obsolete – a number of interventions and treatment strategies have been identified that are more effective at reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders; 5) wasteful – large amounts of money are being wasted on housing youth in facilities that are not effective at reducing recidivism; and 6) inadequate – most juvenile correctional facilities are not equipped to address the needs of many of the confined offenders. The report also identifies six priorities for reforming juvenile corrections and reducing juvenile incarceration. These priorities are: 1) limit eligibility for correctional placements; 2) invest in promising non-residential alternatives; 3) change the financial incentives; 4) adopt best practice reforms for managing youth offenders; 5) replace large institutions with small treatment-oriented facilities for the dangerous few; and 6) use data to hold systems accountable. 12 figures and 145 endnotes
Main Term(s): Juvenile correctional reform
Index Term(s): Assessment (juvenile); Correctional institutions (juvenile); Juvenile adjudication; Juvenile correctional facilities; Juvenile correctional planning; Juvenile Corrections/Detention; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness; Juvenile Corrections/Detention trends; Juvenile day treatment services; Juvenile detention; Juvenile detention decisionmaking; Juvenile detention reform; Juvenile justice management; Juvenile justice policies; Juvenile justice reform; Juvenile justice system; Juvenile length of stay; Juvenile rehabilitation; Juvenile residential treatment centers
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=258235

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.