skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 236498 Find in a Library
Title: Question of Control?: The Formulation of Suspect and Witness Interview Question Strategies by Advanced Interviewers
Journal: Police Science & Management  Volume:13  Issue:3  Dated:Autumn 2011  Pages:255-267
Author(s): Andy Griffiths; Becky Milne; Julie Cherryman
Date Published: 2011
Page Count: 13
Publisher: http://www.vathek.com 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Using ‘think-aloud’ techniques, two independent groups of police officers (n=9) with advanced training in interviewing of either suspects or witnesses were individually interviewed about how they had structured their questioning during two phases of a simulated interview conducted on a training course.
Abstract: All investigative interviews are dialogues set within a legal context specific to an individual country or jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the need to ask questions appropriately is common to every interview, if reliable information is to be obtained. Despite this fact, published research has frequently reported a lack of skill in both the types of questions used by interviewers and the manner in which they are asked. However, during a recent quantitative evaluation of an advanced interview training program in the UK, it was observed that graduates of this program, in contrast to previous research, appeared to employ highly structured questioning strategies, methodically covering relevant subject matter across the complete time-span of an interview. The current study is a follow-up study using an alternative qualitative methodology for a deeper exploration of the rationale behind the formation of these questioning strategies. The results confirm, first, the high level of conscious decisionmaking employed by the advanced interviewers in formulating their question strategies, but secondly, identify excessive levels of control evident in some interviews with compliant witnesses. Finally, the results confirm the complex nature of real-life investigative interviewing, even for highly trained interviewers. The results are discussed. (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Field interrogation and interview; Foreign police; Interview and interrogation; Police interviewing training; Suspect interrogation; United Kingdom (UK)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=258504

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.