skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 236823 Find in a Library
Title: Identifying the Predictors of Pretrial Failure: A Meta-Analysis
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:75  Issue:2  Dated:September 2011  Pages:78-87
Author(s): Kristin Bechtel; Christopher T. Lowenkamp; Alex Holsinger
Date Published: September 2011
Page Count: 10
Type: Literature Review; Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports on a meta-analysis intended to identify from previous research what risk factors are statistically associated with various measures of pretrial failure (re-arrest, failure to appear in court, new crime, and any failure to comply with pretrial-release conditions).
Abstract: The findings of previous studies on factors linked to failure on pretrial release yielded very few correlations that were strong predictors of pretrial failures. Those risk factors with the strongest correlations that were also in the expected direction are primarily static indicators, such as prior convictions, prior felonies, prior misdemeanors, prior failure to appear, and juvenile arrests. Scores on pretrial risk assessments were found to be significant, suggesting that higher scores on pretrial risk assessments correlated significantly with pretrial failure outcomes. Although there were insignificant predictors of pretrial failures, several factors for which data were obtained to determine pretrial release success were either found to be in the wrong direction or were consistently insignificant for predicting pretrial-release failures. These are residency, injury to a victim, using a weapon, and abusing alcohol. Although the authors advise that this study should be considered preliminary in the identification of pretrial risk predictors, several policy implications are offered for consideration. First, the administration of pretrial risk tools should continue. Second, residency, weapons, alcohol use, and victim injury might still be risk items for pretrial failure; however, future research should explore whether or not these factors are consistently related to nonappearance at court or risk to public safety. Third, studies of pretrial risk predictors or the validation of pretrial risk assessment tools should be published or publicly disseminated. Fourth, research on pretrial risk factors and assessment tools should provide the necessary statistics, so as to allow for the calculation of effect sizes. 12 tables, 20 references, and appended supplementary information on the methodology of the meta-analysis
Main Term(s): Corrections research
Index Term(s): Failure factors; Prediction; Pretrial intervention; Pretrial procedures; Pretrial release; Recidivism prediction
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.