skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 236842 Find in a Library
Title: Familial DNA Searching: Issues and Answers - Panel Discussion at the 2011 NIJ Conference
Author(s): Kristina Rose; Stephen Mercer; Mitch Morrissey; Steven R. Siegel
Date Published: June 2011
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: Agency Summary|Audio (01:19:53)|HTML (Transcript)
Agency Summary: 
Type: Conference Material; Issue Overview; Presentation (Multimedia)
Format: Audio Recording; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This audio and its transcript cover panel presentations on issues in familial DNA searching, which was part of the 2011 National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Conference.
Abstract: Two presenters from the District Attorney’s Office in Denver, CO, discuss the background and policies associated with their office’s use of familial DNA searching in developing leads in various cases, particularly cases that have gone unsolved for a long period. Familial searching occurs when there is no direct match between DNA found at a crime scene and one in CODIS. Familial DNA searching is a broader search of CODIS that may find indications that the DNA from the crime scene is from a member of the family of an individual who is in CODIS. The family relationship is considered particularly strong for males with the same Y-STR type. The two presenters from the Denver District Attorney’s office discuss their efforts to bring familial DNA searching into the office’s investigative repertoire and the development of policies that address privacy issues regarding members of families involved in a familial DNA match. The cost-benefit of this investigative technique is also discussed. A third presenter, Stephen Mercer - chief attorney in the Forensics Division of the Office of the Public Defender in Baltimore, MD - discusses why his State has banned familial DNA searching, because it is viewed as a misuse of CODIS, an invasion of the privacy of families that may become involved in such a search, and generally does not produce successful outcomes.
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Colorado; Combined DNA Index System (CODIS); DNA Typing; Investigative techniques; Maryland; NIJ Resources; Parentage determination; Suspect identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.