skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 236843 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of NIJ by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences: NIJ's Response Panel Discussion at the 2011 NIJ Conference
Author(s): Thomas Feucht; Daniel Nagin; John H. Laub
Corporate Author: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: June 2011
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: Agency Summary|Audio (01:14:39)|HTML (Transcript)
Agency Summary: 
Type: Conference Material; Presentation (Multimedia); Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Audio (Online); Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This is the audio and transcript of a presentation at the 2011 NIJ Conference that summarizes the National Institute of Justice’s (NIJ’s) efforts to improve its services based on the National Research Council’s (NRC’s) evaluation of NIJ’s operations.
Abstract: NRC’s evaluation of NIJ suggested that NIJ ensure independence and improve governance, strengthen the science mission, bolster the research infrastructure, enhance the scientific integrity and transparency of research operations, and establish a culture of self-assessment. John Laub, the Director of NIJ, presents NIJ’s response to the NRC evaluation. Overall, NIJ views the report’s recommendations as a blueprint for NIJ to follow in improving its operations. NIJ is in the process of drafting a change in the statute to establish qualifications for the NIJ Director in terms of experience with science and research and modify the term of the NIJ Director to 6 years. Other statuory changes being worked on pertain to the independence of NIJ in all aspects of its key work, particularly in commissioning research and in publishing and disseminating research findings. Also under consideration by NIJ is the development of a multi-year planning stage. Steps taken to strengthen the science mission of NIJ are also explained. Peer review panels are being considered. Steps taken to build a culture of science and improve the transparency of NIJ’s work are underway as well.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Evaluation of evaluation; Long range planning; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); Organization development; Organization studies; Research programs
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.