skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 236845 Find in a Library
Title: State Responses to Mass Incarceration - Panel Discussion at the 2011 NIJ Conference
Author(s): Nadine Frederique; Jake Horowitz; Marc Levin; Ed Rhine
Date Published: June 2011
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: Agency Summary|Video (01:21:31)
Agency Summary: 
Type: Conference Material; Issue Overview
Format: Document (Online); Video (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This is the video and transcript of presentations at the 2011 NIJ Conference from a panel on “State Responses to Mass Incarceration.”
Abstract: One panel member discusses Ohio’s response to the Council of State Governments' (CSG's) report on how that State might reduce its mass incarceration; the State was then operating at 132 percent of capacity. Ohio will soon consider incorporating CSG recommendation into law so as to reduce mass incarceration without compromising public safety. A major issue to be considered is sentencing reform, with attention to reducing the incarceration of first-time property and drug offenders, requiring them to serve probation with appropriate treatment provided. The background for this recommendation is presented. The second panel presenter discusses the impact of Arkansas’ experience with mass incarceration and outlines the findings and recommendations that emerged from technical assistance designed to increase cost-effective community-based sentences for offenses that have typically received incarceration. The third panel presenter provides information on a similar strategy for reducing mass incarceration in Texas without compromising public safety.
Main Term(s): Correctional reform
Index Term(s): Alternatives to Incarceration; Alternatives to institutionalization; Arkansas; Ohio; Overcrowding; Sentencing reform; Texas
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.