skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 236849 Find in a Library
Title: Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Networks and Child Pornography: Possession or Dissemination? Charging Decisions and Other Issues
Journal: The Prosecutor  Volume:45  Issue:3  Dated:July/August/September 2011  Pages:38-40,42
Author(s): Justin Fitzsimmons, Atty
Date Published: 2011
Page Count: 4
Publisher: http://www.ndaa.org 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article evaluates the application of dissemination charges when a defendant uses a peer-to-peer file sharing network to obtain child pornography.
Abstract: Any prosecutor analyzing an investigation involving the use of a peer-to-peer network should take steps to determine the appropriate charges to file against a defendant. That review must involve comparing the available evidence to the elements for the crimes of distribution and dissemination of child pornography. Each prosecutor should speak with the investigator or computer forensic examiner to determine whether sufficient evidence exists of the defendant’s knowledge of how a peer-to-peer file sharing network works. The computer forensic examination should be reviewed for specific key words and data demonstrating intent to access child pornography. A prosecutor should review the defendant’s statement to determine what evidence of that knowledge is present. This includes specific knowledge of the defendant’s computer usage, whether the defendant installed the software program, whether the defendant changed any of the default settings, and whether the defendant admitted to understanding that the peer-to-peer network is based on the file sharing; if this evidence is present elevated charges may be appropriate. 44 references
Main Term(s): Child Pornography; Child Protection
Index Term(s): Computer crime investigative Training; Computer evidence; Evidence collection; Evidence technicians; Pornography as crime factor
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=258869

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.