skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 237009 Find in a Library
Title: Beyond Rehabilitation: A New Theory of Indeterminate Sentencing
Journal: American Criminal Law Review  Volume:48  Issue:3  Dated:Summer 2011  Pages:1247-1292
Author(s): Michael M. O'Hear
Date Published: 2011
Page Count: 46
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper proposes a new normative model for the use of indeterminate sentencing.
Abstract: Towards the end of the 20th century courts stopped using the practice of indeterminate sentencing which enabled judges to sentence offenders to a range of potential imprisonment with the actual release date determined at a later time. This process was associated with the rehabilitative paradigm of criminal law popular in the mid-20th century that later fell out of favor by the 1970s. With the resurgence of parole as an integral part of sentencing, this article examines a new normative model for indeterminate sentencing grounded in a retributive, communicative theory of punishment in hopes of bringing stability and coherence to the sentencing aspect of the U.S. criminal justice system. The article examines the major themes that are found in contemporary retributivism, such as seeing punishment as a form of communication and looking at it from a system-wide perspective. The author then presents one particular theory of retributive punishment that is used as the basis for the new normative model of indeterminate sentencing. He presents in detail his reasons for using indeterminate sentencing based on a retributive theory of punishment as opposed to a rehabilitative one. Appendix
Main Term(s): Indeterminate sentences
Index Term(s): Federal sentencing guidelines; Mandatory Sentencing; Sentence effectiveness; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing reform; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.