skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 237183 Find in a Library
Title: Costs and Benefits of Behavioral Health Court: Findings From "Examining Program Costs and Outcomes of San Francisco’s Behavioral Health Court"
Author(s): Arley Lindberg MSW
Corporate Author: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 4
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document; News/Media
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the evaluation outcomes and methodology for the San Francisco Behavioral Health Court (BHC), which was established in early 2003 in order to provide close monitoring of a subset of mentally ill offenders whose criminal behavior is directly linked to their mental illness.
Abstract: The evaluation outcome results showed that participation in the court, even when a participant did not complete the entire program, contributed to positive outcomes. BHC participation predicted a longer time to any new charge. At 18 months, the treatment group was 26 percent less likely to be charged with a new offense compared to the treatment-as-usual group. BHC participation also resulted in a longer time to a new charge for a violent offense. The treatment group was 55 percent less likely to be charged with a new violent offense compared to the treatment-as-usual group. Outcomes for BHC graduates were significantly better for the aforementioned measures compared to both BHC non-graduates and the treatment-as-usual group. Participation in BHC is voluntary; and in many cases, the defendant is not required to enter a guilty plea to criminal charges in order to enter the program. In order to qualify for BHC participation, defendants must be diagnosed as having an axis 1 mental disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) or, in some circumstances, developmental disabilities. Defendants must also be amenable to treatment in the community mental health system. The seriousness of the charge is also a consideration. The BHC provides services to participants through a continuum of care, beginning with in-jail services, transitional care prior to release, and early release into the community. The court has adopted several practices for treating mentally ill offenders. Cost and relevant studies are reviewed. 2 references with Web site addresses
Main Term(s): Mental Health Courts
Index Term(s): California; Mental health services; Mentally ill offenders; Recidivism; Recidivism statistics; Services effectiveness
Note: From "Crime Solutions.gov"
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=259210

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.