skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 237338 Find in a Library
Title: Educating Juries in Sexual Assault Cases - Part 1: Using Voir Dire to Eliminate Jury Bias
Author(s): Christopher Mallios, J.D.; Toolsi Meisner, J.D.
Date Published: July 2010
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: AEquitas
Washington, DC 20005
US Dept of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2009-TA-AX-K024
Sale Source: AEquitas
1100 H. Street, Suite 310
Washington, DC 20005
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.aequitasresource.org 
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: News/Media
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on research, journal articles, and authoritative publications, this article suggests ways to improve jury-selection techniques in sexual assault cases, so prosecutors can screen out individuals who accept rape myths as true.
Abstract: One rape myth is that sexual assault is more likely to be committed by a stranger to the victim than someone she/he knows. Thus, it is appropriate that a prosecutor be permitted to ask potential jurors during voir dire (jury selection) whether they would be less likely to convict a defendant of rape if that defendant was a partner, friend, or acquaintance of the victim. Another question that should be posed to potential jurors is whether they are able to follow the judge’s instructions regarding the definition of rape regardless of their personal beliefs. Another common rape myth is that victims can contribute to their sexual assault by wearing provocative clothing or engaging in seductive behavior. Prosecutors should be allowed to ask questions of potential jurors regarding whether they believe that a victim can be raped even if that victim consented to some intimate contact with the defendant prior to the sexual assault. Another common misperception of rape is that it is a momentary loss of control over sexual urges rather than an act of violence and aggression in which the perpetrator uses sex as a weapon to gain power and control over the victim. Prosecutors should determine whether a potential juror views rape as the result of a man being unable to control his sexual drive. Other rape myths that must be addressed in voir dire are that rape victims must have incurred injuries in order for rape to have occurred and that rape is unlikely to have occurred if the victim delayed reporting it to police. 36 notes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Jury selection; Prosecutor training; Prosecutorial discretion; Sexual assault; Sexual assault trauma; Sexual assault victims; Voir dire
Note: Strategies, Issue 2, July 2010
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=259368

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.