skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 237556 Find in a Library
Title: Fair Defense Report: Findings and Recommendations on Indigent Defense Practices in Texas
Corporate Author: Texas Appleseed
United States of America
Project Director: Robert Spangenberg
Date Published: December 2000
Page Count: 47
Sponsoring Agency: Arca Foundation
New York, NY 10028
Hogg Foundation for Mental Health
Austin, TX 78713
National Assoc for Mental Health
New York, NY 10019
Open Society Foundation
New York, NY 10019
Public Welfare Foundation
Washington, DC 20009-4443
Southern Poverty Law Ctr
Montgomery, AL 36104
Texas Appleseed
Austin, TX 78704
Sale Source: Texas Appleseed
512 East Riverside Drive
Suite 212
Austin, TX 78704
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This Fair Defense Report presents findings and recommendations on indigent defense practices in Texas and describes the methodology of the study.
Abstract: Findings are divided into sections according to indigent defense representation in non-capital felonies and misdemeanors, capital offenses, offenses by defendants with mental illness, and the representation of indigent juveniles in juvenile court. Based on the findings, 46 recommendations are presented. In September 2000, the Judicial Section of the State Bar of Texas adopted a resolution that specifies recommended policies and procedures for achieving the goal of quality representation to indigent persons involved in the criminal justice system. The researchers for this report support four of these recommendations. One recommendation is that the appointment of criminal defense counsel for indigent defendants and the amounts paid to counsel should be reported to an appropriate State agency. Second, appointment procedures should be reduced to writing, and copies should be sent to an appropriate entity for dissemination. Third, minimum standard for proficiency in criminal law should be established in each local jurisdiction as a prerequisite for eligibility for placement on a list of attorneys eligible for appointments. Fourth, funding for appointed counsel and related services should be appropriated by the Texas Legislature from State funds, and the Legislature should adopt compensation standards. In developing the findings and the recommendations, the Appleseed Fair Defense Project conducted systematic information gathering and analysis in a representative sample of 23 Texas counties that contained 61 percent of the State’s population. At each site, researchers spoke directly with the people who best knew the indigent defense system in the county, i.e., the judges, court administrators, county officials, defense counsel, and prosecutors who are responsible for the daily operation of indigent defense in that county and representatives of the affected communities. Appended list of counties involved in the study, a summary of survey results on indigent criminal defense expenditure by county, comparison of State indigent defense expenditures, and indigent defense representation in capital cases: a State-by-State comparison
Main Term(s): Court management
Index Term(s): Court reform; Defender systems; Indigent Defense; Indigents; Public defenders; Texas
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=259588

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.