skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 237607 Find in a Library
Title: Effective Supervision Strategies: Do Frequent Changes of Supervision Officers Affect Probationer Outcomes?
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:75  Issue:3  Dated:December 2011  Pages:11-18
Author(s): Jason Clark-Miller; Kelli D. Stevens
Date Published: December 2011
Page Count: 8
Publisher: https://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/UnderstandingtheFederalCourts/AdministrativeOffice.aspx 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on a comparison of the probation histories of 5,134 offenders, this study found that both the number of probation officers (POs) a probationer had and the amount of time each PO supervised a case influenced the likelihood of its successful termination.
Abstract: The study found that probationers who were supervised by a few POs were more likely to complete probation successfully than probationers who were supervised by many officers. The data also indicate that probationers who spent the majority of their probation term with a few POs were less likely to recidivate than probationers whose time on probation was spread out over a number of officers. The impact of officer continuity was dramatic, with the chances of successful completion increasing by 58 percent for an offender with one officer during the entire term of supervision. Probationers in the study transferred from one PO to another for a variety of reasons, but the most prevalent was personnel turnover. It also resulted from probationers moving from one jurisdiction to another in the course of a probation period. Although personnel changes may sometimes be unavoidable; unnecessary change is a disruptive factor that potentially undermines much of what has otherwise been achieved. An issue that must be addressed in this regard is PO retention, which requires a review of PO salaries in relation to other expenditures that may not be as critical in promoting a reduction in recidivism. Suggestions are offered for future research. Study data were obtained from records of a community corrections agency in a large metropolitan county in Texas. The data pertained to all offenders whose probation ended in 2009. Cases that did not originate in the county were excluded. 3 tables and 46 references
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Probation; Probation casework; Probation effectiveness; Probation management; Turnover rates
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=259639

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.