skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 237756 Find in a Library
Title: Theoretical Models for Obtaining Nobel Prizes in the Area of Forensic Science
Journal: Internal Security  Volume:2  Issue:1  Dated:2010  Pages:183-191
Author(s): Csaba Fenyvesi
Date Published: 2010
Page Count: 9
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Poland
Annotation: This article examines two theories being conducted by individuals in the areas of basic science that could be of importance to the area of forensic science.
Abstract: The two ‘Nobel Prize-potential’ theoretical topics discussed in this article by the author, a practicing lawyer who deals with forensic science, but does not do any research. Clearly, the person(s) making the discoveries discussed in this article are not forensic experts but biologists, bio-chemists, physicists, etc., that is, persons dealing with basic science. 1) To make a step forward in the method of scent identification, a transparent, checkable examination method and accountable individuals who are also responsible for the results are necessary. This basic research tool is not at our disposal at present, but it could be the basis of prestigious international acclaim: and this is the description of human scent. The modeling of the molecular structure of scent would be worthy of the Nobel Prize. 2) The polygraph is a useful device in verifying different investigative versions, which some people call a lie-detector (or ‘honesty-meter’). The problem is: the method of examination does not provide an answer to or explanation of the reason of this conclusion. Consequently, the result may get distorted, as the person replying might not be honest for a thousand of reasons independent of a criminal act (e.g. earlier personal good or bad experience, or to cover up for another person or another act). If one examines not the physiological phenomena of the person undergoing the procedure but the real thoughts and memories appearing in their brain. That is, it is not a body-polygraph we need, but a reader/scanner concentrating only (mono) on the brain (monoscanner). (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Forensic sciences
Index Term(s): Criminal justice research; Polygraphs; Research and development
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.