skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 40183 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS AND STATE PRACTICES, V 4 - JURISDICTION-DELINQUENCY
Author(s): ANON
Corporate Author: US Dept of Justice
Law Enforcement Assistance Admin
National Institute for Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention
Date Published: 1977
Page Count: 61
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
US Dept of Justice
Grant Number: 75-TA-99-0016
Sale Source: Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: EIGHT SECTIONS OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF ISSUES REGARDING JUVENILE COURT JURISDICTION.
Abstract: THIS VOLUME IS ONE OF NINE IN A SERIES OF WORKING PAPERS OF THE NATIONAL TASK FORCE TO DEVELOP STANDARDS AND GOALS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION. ISSUES WITHIN EACH ANALYSIS ARE ORGANIZED BY TITLE, DESCRIPTION, SUMMARY OF MAJOR POSITIONS, SUMMARY OF STATE PRACTICES, SUMMARY OF POSITIONS RECOMMENDED BY OTHER STANDARDS GROUPS, ANALYSIS, AND TASK FORCE STANDARDS AND RATIONALE. THE FIRST TWO SECTIONS OF THIS VOLUME CONSIDER THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM AGES TO WHICH ADJUDICATORY JURISDICTION SHOULD ATTACH. RELATED SECTIONS DISCUSS THE STAGE AT WHICH A JUVENILE'S AGE SHOULD BE DETERMINED AND WHEN A JUVENILE SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO AN ADULT COURT. ALSO COMMENTED UPON IS THE APPROPRIATE DURATION OF JUVENILE COURT JURISDICTION. THE LAST TWO PAPERS IN THE VOLUME FOCUS ON JUVENILE VENUE STATUS AND TRAFFIC OFFENSES. FOR OTHER VOLUMES IN THIS SERIES, SEE NCJ-40289, 40290, 40051, 40192, 40181, 40024, 40283 AND 40299. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis; Jurisdiction; Juvenile courts; Juvenile justice standards; Model law; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=40183

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.