Skip to main content skip navigation
  • Account
    • Login
    • Manage
  • Subscribe
    • JUSTINFO
    • Register
  • Shopping Cart
  • Contact Us
    • Email
    • Feedback
    • Chat
    • Phone or Mail
  • Site Help
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Office of Justice Programs header with links to bureaus/offices: BJA, BJS, NIJ, OJJDP, OVC, SMART Office of Justice Programs BJA BJS NIJ OJJDP OVC SMART Office of Justice Programs
Advanced Search  Search Help
    Browse By Topics  down arrow
  • A–Z Topics
  • Corrections
  • Courts
  • Crime
  • Crime Prevention
  • Drugs
  • Justice System
  • Juvenile Justice
  • Law Enforcement
  • Victims
CrimeSolutions
Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar
  • ABOUT NCJRS
  • OJP PUBLICATIONS
  • LIBRARY
  • SEARCH Q & A
  • GRANTS & FUNDING
  • JUSTICE EVENTS
Home / Publications / NCJRS Abstract

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

 

NCJ Number: 43437 Find in a Library
Title: FORCIBLE RAPE AND THE PROBLEM OF THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED (FROM FORCIBLE RAPE - THE CRIME, THE VICTIM, AND THE OFFENDER, 1977 BY DUNCAN CHAPPELL, ROBLEY GEIS, AND GILBER GEIS - SEE NCJ-43432)
Author(s): E SAGARIN
Date Published: 1977
Annotation: A DISCUSSION OF RAPE AS A CRIME IN WHICH FALSE ACCUSATIONS MAY OCCUR EXAMINES THE QUESTION OF ENSURING EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW FOR BOTH THE VICTIM AND THE SUGGESTED.
Abstract: THE CHARGE OF RAPE MAY BE FALSELY LEVELED IN CASES WHERE NO SEXUAL ENCOUNTER HAS OCCURRED, WHERE CONSENSUAL INTERCOURSE HAS TAKEN PLACE, OR WHERE THE VICTIM OF AN ACTUAL RAPE MAKES A MISTAKEN IDENTIFICATION, ALBEIT IN GOOD FAITH, OF HER ATTACKER. AN EXAMINATION OF THE FIRST CATEGORY SHOWS THAT THE MOST FREQUENT EXPERIENCE OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS IN THE COMPLETE ABSENCE OF SEXUAL CONTACT INVOLVES RACIAL MATTERS AND THE DELIBERATE EFFORT TO OPPRESS THE BLACK PEOPLE. THE AUTHOR ILLUSTRATES THIS CONTENTION WITH THE EXAMPLE OF THE 'SCOTTSBORO CASE,' IN WHICH NINE BLACK YOUTHS WERE ACCUSED BY TWO WHITE GIRLS OF RAPE; ONE OF THE GIRLS LATER DENIED THAT AN ATTACK HAD EVER OCCURRED, AND EVIDENCE SURFACED THAT THE GIRLS WERE PROSTITUTES. NINETY PERCENT OF THE EXTRALEGAL MOB LYNCHINGS THAT TOOK PLACE BETWEEN THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION AND WORL WAR II INVOLVED BLACKS, 20 PERCENT OF WHOM WERE ACCUSED OF RAPE. INVESTIGATIONS HAVE INDICATED THAT IN THE GREAT MAJORITY OF INSTANCES, THERE WAS NO SEXUAL ENCOUNTER BETWEEN THE LYNCHED INDIVIDUAL AND ANY WHITE WOMAN. CASES INVOLVING CONSENSUAL INTERCOURSE IN WHICH RAPE WAS CHARGED AND CASES OF MISTAKEN IDENTIFICATION CITED PROVE THE POSSIBLE IMPORTANCE OF PRIOR SEXUAL CONDUCT ON THE VICTIM'S PART AND THE NEED FOR CORROBORATION. THE CONCEPT OF 'INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY' IS DISCUSSED IN RELATION TO FEMINIST OUTCRY OVER CASES WHICH PIT THE WORD OF THE VICTIM AGAINST THE WORD OF THE ACCUSED. AMONG THE GUIDELINES SUGGESTED FOR PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED AND THE COMPLAINANT ARE: (1) PRETRIAL TESTIMONY TO DETERMINE WHETHER EXAMINATION OF THE SEXUAL HISTORY OF EITHER PARTY IS RELEVANT AND ADMISSIBLE, WITHOUT VIOLATING THE ACCUSED'S RIGHTS AS A DEFENDANT (WHICH ARE GREATER THAN THE RIGHTS OF THE COMPLAINANT); (2) ANONYMITY TO PROTECT THE COMPLAINANT; (3) UNCORROBORATED TESTIMONY OF A COMPLAINANT, IN THE FACE OF A DENIAL BY A DEFENDANT, SHOULD BE INSUFFICIENT TO CONVICT; AND (4) COMPLAINANTS SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM UNSYMPATHETIC POLICE OFFICERS. CONVICTIONS FOR RAPE HAVE NOT BEEN EASILY OBTAINED, BOTH BECAUSE OF THE DIFFICULTY OF PROVING THE INVOLUNTARY NATURE OF THE ACT AND THE RELUCTANCE OF VICTIMS TO PROSECUTE FOR FEAR OF BEING STIGMATIZED OR HUMILIATED. EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO CONVICT AN OFFENDER SHORT OF DENYING THE ACCUSED THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL. REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED.
Index Term(s): Black/African Americans; Equal Protection; Rape; Right to fair trial; Rights of the accused
Sponsoring Agency: Columbia University Press
New York, NY 10025
Corporate Author: Columbia University Press
United States of America
Page Count: 19
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=43437

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.




Find in a Library

You have clicked Find in a Library. A title search of WorldCat, the world's largest library network, will start when you click "Continue." Here you will be able to learn if libraries in your community have the document you need. The results will open in a new browser and your NCJRS session will remain active for 30 minutes. Learn More.

You have selected:

This article appears in

In WorldCat, verify that the library you select has the specific journal volume and issue in which the article appears. Learn How.

Continue to WorldCat

You are about to access WorldCat, NCJRS takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the WorldCat site.

 
Office of Justice Programs Facebook Page  Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Assistance Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics Twitter Page
  • National Institute of Justice Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office for Victims of Crime Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking Facebook Page Twitter Page
Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers
USA.gov | CrimeSolutions
Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs