skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 43994 Find in a Library
Title: COST OF THE DEATH PENALTY
Journal: CRIMINAL LAW BULLETIN  Volume:14  Issue:1  Dated:(JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1978)  Pages:69-80
Author(s): B NAKELL
Corporate Author: Warren, Gorham and Lamont, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Warren, Gorham and Lamont, Inc
Boston, MA 02111
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: THE ARGUMENT THAT A JUDICIAL AND CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM WITH THE DEATH PENALTY IS MORE COSTLY THAN A SYSTEM WITHOUT THE DEATH PENALTY IS SET FORTH.
Abstract: THE ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED IN THE CONTEXT OF PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S 1976 DEATH PENALTY DECISIONS. IN A CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM, BOTH THE TRIAL PROCESS AND THE APPEAL PROCESS ARE EXPENSIVE. IN CONTRAST TO NONCAPITAL CASES, ALL CAPITAL CASES REQUIRE JURY TRIALS. SUCH TRIALS GENERALLY ARE LONGER, MORE COMPLEX, AND MORE EXPENSIVE THAN TRIALS IN OTHER CASES, INCLUDING OTHER MURDER CASES. PRISONERS SENTENCED TO DEATH EXHAUST ALL AVENUES FOR RELIEF, SEEKING REVIEW IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, FILING POSTCONVICTION PETITIONS IN STATE COURTS, FILING HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS IN FEDERAL COURTS, ASKING GOVERNORS FOR COMMUTATION, AND FILING OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW. THE COSTS OF DEFENSE, PROSECUTION, AND COURT REVIEW MUST BE INCLUDED IN COMPUTING THE FINANCIAL COSTS OF THE DEATH PENALTY. THE CORRECTIONS PROCESS ALSO SUFFERS IN A CAPITAL PUNISHMENT SYSTEM, LARGELY BECAUSE OF SECURITY PRECAUTIONS IMPOSED BY SUCH A SYSTEM. ALTHOUGH IT MAY COST LESS TO EXECUTE A PARTICULAR OFFENDER THAN TO MAINTAIN THE OFFENDER IN PRISON FOR LIFE, IT COSTS FAR MORE TO FINANCE A SYSTEM IN WHICH THE DECISION IS MADE TO EXECUTE SOME PEOPLE, ALL OF WHOM ARE PROCESSED THROUGH THE ENTIRE SYSTEM, AND SOME OF WHOM MUST STILL BE MAINTAINED FOR LIFE. THERE IS NO RELIABLE BASIS FOR BELIEVING THAT THE DEATH PENALTY SERVES EITHER A DETERRENT OR A RETRIBUTIVE PURPOSE. THOSE WHO ARE NOT CONVINCED BY LOFTIER ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY SHOULD BE PERSUADED BY THE COST-BENEFIT VIEW THAT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS A BAD INVESTMENT. NO SUPPORTING DATA ARE INCLUDED.
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Cost analysis
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=43994

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.