skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 47337 Find in a Library
Title: CONTINUING THE DIALOGUE - CIVIL JURIES AND THE ALLOCATION OF JUDICIAL POWER
Journal: TEXAS LAW REVIEW  Volume:56  Issue:1  Dated:(DECEMBER 1977)  Pages:47-60
Author(s): P E HIGGINBOTHAM
Corporate Author: Texas Law Review Publications, Inc
School of Law
University of Texas
United States of America
Date Published: 1977
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: Texas Law Review Publications, Inc
Austin, TX 78705
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ROLE OF THE CIVIL JURY TRIAL IN THE FEDERAL COURTS IS OFFERED.
Abstract: IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE RIGHT TO A CIVIL JURY TRIAL IN THE FEDERAL COURTS HAS ALWAYS REPRESENTED AN ISSUE OF POWER ALLOCATION. ALTHOUGH BRITAIN'S VIRTUAL ABANDONMENT OF CIVIL JURIES IS OFTEN CITED AS EVIDENCE OF THE JURY'S OBSOLESCENCE, EXAMINATION OF THE BRITISH EXPERIENCE POINTS TO CIRCUMSTANCES THAT PRECLUDE SUCH A GENERALIZATION. CRITICS OF THE CIVIL JURY CLAIM THAT THE JURY CANNOT HANDLE BIG OR TECHNICAL CASES AND THAT THE JURY IS AN UNNECESSARY SOURCE OF DELAY AND EXPENSE. IT IS ARGUED THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO PRESUME THAT A JUDGE IS MORE ADEPT AT COMPREHENDING COMPLEX FACTUAL MATERIAL THAN A JURY; THAT BENCH TRIALS MAY ACTUALLY ENGENDER MORE DELAYS THAN JURY TRIALS; AND THAT THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY IMPOSES A DISCIPLINE ON BOTH THE COURT AND THE ADVOCATES TO ANALYZE THE CASE AND TO PRESENT IN CLEARLY. IT IS POINTED OUT THAT THE JURY PERFORMS A VALUABLE FUNCTION BY RESOLVING ARBITRARY FACTUAL ISSUES AND SPARES THE JUDICIARY FROM ENGAGING IN A SUBTERFUGE THAT WEAKENS ITS CREDIBILITY WITH THE PUBLIC. THE ABSENCE OF A JURY GENERALLY RESULTS IN A CORRESPONDING INCREASE IN THE ROLE AND POWER OF THE APPELLATE COURTS. THE JURY PERFORMS AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN THE FEDERAL SYSTEM BY INFUSING A PUBLIC LAW PERSPECTIVE INTO THE JUDICIAL PROCESS. THE JURY'S ORIGIN IN THE CONSTITUTION AS A POLITICAL INSTITUTION IS REFLECTED IN THE POWER-ALLOCATING FUNCTION IT STILL RETAINS. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MOFIFIED--LKM)
Index Term(s): Federal courts; Juries
Note: REVISED TEXT OF SPEECH GIVEN AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW, OCTOBER 14, 1977, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE LOCKE, PURNELL, BOREN, LANEY AND NEELY MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=47337

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.