skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 49980 Find in a Library
Title: FOURTH AMENDMENT LIMITATIONS ON NON BORDER SEARCHES FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS - THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE MEETS THE CONSTITUTION
Journal: OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL  Volume:39  Issue:1  Dated:(1978)  Pages:66-95
Author(s): R S CATZ
Corporate Author: Ohio State University
College of Law
United States of America
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 30
Sponsoring Agency: Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES THAT PLACE LIMITS ON THE POWER OF IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS TO SEARCH FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE EXAMINED, ALONG WITH TRADITIONAL IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE (INS) ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES.
Abstract: THE INS IS THE FEDERAL AGENCY IN CHARGE OF ENFORCING REGULATIONS OVER ALIENS. MOST INS ABUSE, A RESULT OF EFFORTS TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS AGAINST ILLEGAL ALIENS, IS SUFFERED BY MEXICAN-AMERICANS. AGENTS OF THE INS, FOR EXAMPLE, RANDOMLY INTERROGATE INDIVIDUALS ON CITY STREETS AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES ABOUT THEIR CITIZENSHIP. OPERATIONS OF THE INS IN ONE AREA OF ILLINOIS ARE REPORTED. THE AUTHORITY OF THE INS TO STOP AND INTERROGATE AND ITS CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ARE DISCUSSED. COURT CASES INVOLVING NONBORDER SEARCHES FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE CITED. U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES THAT LIMIT THE POWER OF IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS TO SEARCH FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE AN IMPORTANT INDICATION THAT MANY TRADITIONAL INS ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES WILL NOT BE TOLERATED UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. THERE IS A NATURAL TENSION BETWEEN THE NEED TO STEM THE FLOW OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS TO BE FREE FROM REASONABLE INS INTRUSIONS. COURTS HAVE PUT TO REST THE NOTION THAT ENFORCEMENT PROBLEMS ALONE JUSTIFY INTRUSIONS ON THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. SINCE EMPLOYMENT IS THE PRIMARY REASON FOR ILLEGAL ENTRY, ALTERNATIVE POLICIES IN ADDITION TO INCREASING LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS NEED TO BE DEVELOPED TO REDUCE INCENTIVES FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS TO COME TO THE UNITED STATES. ONE SUGGESTED METHOD IS TO IMPOSE CRIMINAL PENALTIES ON THE EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS. (DP)
Index Term(s): Illegal Immigrants/Aliens; Immigration Naturalization Service (INS); Immigration offenses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=49980

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.