skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 51316 Find in a Library
Title: JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHY AND THE JUDICIAL PROCESS - A SYSTEMS MODEL FOR ANALYSIS, EVALUATION, AND FURTHER RESEARCH
Author(s): A BARTEE
Date Published: 1976
Page Count: 348
Sponsoring Agency: UMI Dissertation Services
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
Sale Source: UMI Dissertation Services
300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346
United States of America
Type: Thesis/Dissertation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A SYSTEMS-ORIENTED MODEL IS PRESENTED TO SHOW THAT JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHY AND QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ARE COMPLEMENTARY. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTIONS CAN ADD DIMENSION TO ABSTRACT FINDINGS OF QUANTITATIVE SCHOLARS.
Abstract: A SURVEY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LITERATURE DESCRIBING THE JUDICIAL PROCESS IS PRESENTED. JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHICAL MATERIALS ARE GROUPED INTO THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES FOR THE ANALYSIS MODEL: INFORMATION THAT RELATES TO BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICS AND PRECOURT CAREER BACKGROUNDS; THEORIES ABOUT JUDICIAL DECISIONMAKING FOCUSING ON THE COURT ITSELF AND THE ACTION, REACTION, AND INTERACTION OF THE JUSTICES WHO COMPOSE IT; AND IDEAS ADVANCED BY POLITICAL SCIENTISTS USING IMPACT ANALYSIS. FOUR COMPREHENSIVE BIOGRAPHICAL ACCOUNTS OF FORMER SUPREME COURT JUSTICES (TAFT, HUGHES, STONE, AND MURPHY) ARE ORGANIZED AND CLASSIFIED TO CONSTRUCT PARALLEL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BIOGRAPHICAL ACCOUNTS AND VARIOUS QUANTITATIVE STUDIES AT EACH OF THE FOLLOWING LEVELS OF THE MODEL: (1) INPUTS (THE FORMATIVE YEARS AND PRECOURT CAREERS OF THESE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES); (2) CONVERSION (THE INTERACTION PROCESS DURING THE COURT PERIODS OF THE JUSTICES); AND (3) IMPACT (DECISIONMAKING PROCESS AS DESCRIBED BY JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHIES). A CASE STUDY IS EXAMINED ALSO TO ILLUSTRATE THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE BIOGRAPHER'S BIAS. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHY AND QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ARE COMPLEMENTARY AND NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE, THAT QUANTITATIVE STUDIES CAN INDICATE POSITIVE CORRELATIONS AMONG THE VARIABLES IN DECISIONMAKING, AND THAT BIOGRAPHY CAN DEAL WITH QUESTIONS OF PURPOSE AND INTENT BASED ON NONSCALEABLE MATERIAL. RECOMMENDATIONS ARE MADE FOR STRUCTURING FUTURE JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHIES TO MAKE THE WORKS MORE VALUABLE TO SCHOLARS USING QUANTITATIVE METHODS. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED--DAG)
Index Term(s): Analysis; Evaluation; Judges; Judicial decisions; Judicial process; US Supreme Court
Note: COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - DOCTORAL DISSERTATION
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=51316

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.