skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 51370 Find in a Library
Title: EMPIRICAL STUDY OF SIX- AND TWELVE-MEMBER JURY DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
Journal: UNIVERSIY OF MICHIGAN JOURNAL OF LAW REFORM  Volume:6  Issue:3  Dated:(SPRING 1973)  Pages:712-734
Author(s): J B KESSLER
Corporate Author: University of Michigan
United States of America
Date Published: 1973
Page Count: 23
Sponsoring Agency: University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY WAS CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE ARE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DECISIONS RENDERED BY 6-MEMBER AND 12-MEMBER JURIES.
Abstract: A VIDEOTAPED MOCK TRIAL WAS SHOWN TO EIGHT 6-MEMBER JURIES AND TO AN EQUAL NUMBER OF 12-MEMBER JURIES. THE MOCK TRIAL INVOLVED AN ACTUAL AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE CASE THAT HAD BEEN SETTLED OUT OF COURT. IT WAS CONDUCTED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES EMPLOYED IN MICHIGAN TRIAL COURTS. SUBJECTS WERE 144 STUDENT JURORS RANDOMLY ASSIGNED FROM UNDERGRADUATE SPEECH CLASSES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN. AFTER VIEWING THE TRIAL, THEY WERE ADMINISTERED A PRELIMINARY QUESTIONNAIRE TO ASCERTAIN THEIR IMMEDIATE INDIVIDUAL VERDICT. A SECOND INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE WAS ADMINISTERED TO COMPARE PREDELIBERATION AND POSTDELIBERATION OPINIONS AFTER LABORATORY SESSIONS WITH THE JURORS RESULTED IN A GROUP DECISION. THE PROBLEM OF SUBJECT MOTIVATION WAS RESOLVED BY GIVING STUDENTS THE IMPRESSION THAT THEY WERE VIEWING A REAL TRIAL AND BY INDICATING THAT THE RESULTS OF THEIR DELIBERATIONS WERE CRITICAL TO THE STUDY. ON THE BASIS OF STATISTICAL COMPARISONS, THE STUDY FOUND THAT THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VERDICTS, LENGTH OF DELIBERATION, AND NUMBERS OF ISSUES DISCUSSED OF THE 6-MEMBER AND 12-MEMBER JURIES. JURORS OF SIX-MEMBER JURIES PARTICIPATED MORE IN DELIBERATION THEN DID THOSE ON 12-MEMBER JURIES; AND 6-MEMBER JURIES WERE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY MORE SATISFIED WITH THE DELIBERATIVE PROCESS THAN 12-MEMBER JURIES. WHILE NOT SIGNIFICANT, THERE WAS A TENDENCY FOR 6-MEMBER MINORITY JURORS TO PARTICIPATE MORE THAN 12-MEMBER MINORITY JURORS. FROM A SMALL GROUP COMMUNICATION STANDPOINT, THE SIX-MEMBER JURY MAY BE SUPERIOR TO THE LARGER GROUP SINCE THE SMALLER SIZE MAY ENCOURAGE MORE OVERALL JUROR PARTICIPATION. BECAUSE ONLY A SMALL NUMBER OF STUDENT JURIES WERE ANALYZED IN THE STUDY, HOWEVER, THE CONCLUSIONS CANNOT BE APPLIED GENERALLY. THE USE OF ONLY ONE CASE AT A TRIAL ALSO LIMITS THE ABILITY TO GENERALIZE THE FINDINGS. SUPPORTING DATA ARE TABULATED, AND THE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE NOT INCLUDED. (DEP)
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Juries; Jury size changes; Studies; Verdicts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=51370

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.